Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
5-2004
Abstract
Participants included 46 European American, 33 Asian American, 91 Japanese, 160 Indian, and 80 Hispanic students (N = 416). Discrete emotions, as well as pleasant and unpleasant emotions, were assessed: (a) with global self-report measures, (b) using an experience-sampling method for 1 week, and (c) by asking participants to recall their emotions from the experience sampling week. Cultural differences emerged for nearly all measures. The inclusion of indigenous emotions in India and Japan did not alter the conclusions substantially, although pride showed a pattern across cultures that differed from the other positive emotions. In all five culturalgroupsandforbothpleasantandunpleasantemotions,globalreportsof emotionpredictedretrospective recall even after controllingforreportsmadeduringthe experiencesamplingperiod,suggestingthat individuals’ general conceptions of their emotional lives influenced their memories of emotions. Cultural differences emerged in the degree to which recall of frequency of emotion was related to experience sampling reports of intensity of emotions. Despite the memory bias, the three methods led to similar conclusions about the relative position of the groups.
Keywords
culture, emotion, experience sampling methodology, memory for emotions
Discipline
Multicultural Psychology | Personality and Social Contexts
Research Areas
Psychology
Publication
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Volume
35
Issue
3
First Page
304
Last Page
326
ISSN
0022-0221
Identifier
10.1177/0022022104264124
Publisher
SAGE
Citation
SCOLLON, Christie N., DIENER, Ed, OISHI, Shigehiro, & BISWAS-DIENER, Robert.(2004). Emotions across Cultures and Methods. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(3), 304-326.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/924
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022104264124