Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
12-2011
Abstract
Cosmopolitanism is frequently criticised for overlooking the situatedness of morality and the importance of solidarity in their aspiration to global justice. A number of thinkers take these criticisms seriously and pursue ‘a communitarian path to cosmopolitanism’. Four such approaches are considered. All four view morality and justice as grounded in a specific social setting and hold that justice is more likely to result if there is some ‘we-feeling’ among people, but are simultaneously committed to expanding the realm of justice and moral concern to beyond national boundaries. To enable the theorisation of an expanded realm of situated justice and moral concern, community is conceived as not necessarily corresponding to political boundaries and the moral the self is seen as able and eager to loosen some of its traditional moral connections and to form new ones. Unfortunately, these approaches are likely to exclude significant segments of the world’s population from the expanded realm of moral concern they theorise, most notably, a large proportion of the world’s poor. It is suggested that the thought of Emmanuel Levinas might offer a way of reducing the gap between solidarity and moral universalism.
Discipline
Ethics and Political Philosophy | Political Science
Research Areas
Political Science
Publication
Review of International Studies
Volume
37
Issue
5
First Page
2365
Last Page
2385
ISSN
0260-2105
Identifier
10.1017/S0260210510001233
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Citation
JORDAAN, Eduard.(2011). Including the excluded: Communitarian paths to cosmopolitanism. Review of International Studies, 37(5), 2365-2385.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/869
Copyright Owner and License
Author
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001233