Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
5-2026
Abstract
Generative AI tools are increasingly embedded in everyday work and learning, yet their fluency, opacity, and propensity to hallucinate mean that users must critically evaluate AI outputs rather than accept them at face value. The present research conceptualises critical thinking in AI use as a dispositional tendency to verify the source and content of AI-generated information, to understand how models work and where they fail, and to reflect on the broader implications of relying on AI. Across six studies ( N = 1341), we developed and validated the 13-item critical thinking in AI use scale and mapped its nomological network. Study 1 generated and content-validated scale items. Study 2 supported a three-factor structure (Verification, Motivation, and Reflection). Studies 3 and 4 confirmed the higher-order model, demonstrated strong factor loadings, internal consistency, sex invariance, convergent and discriminant evidence for validity, and showed that critical thinking in AI use was positively associated with openness, extraversion, positive trait affect, and frequency of AI use. Study 5 supported the scale's test-retest reliability. Lastly, Study 6 demonstrated criterion evidence of validity for the scale, with higher critical thinking in AI use scores predicting more frequent and diverse verification strategies, greater veracity judgement accuracy in a novel and naturalistic GPT-powered AI chatbot fact-checking task, and deeper reflection about responsible AI. The current work clarifies why and how people exercise oversight over generative AI outputs and provides a validated scale and ecologically grounded paradigm to support theory testing, cross-group, and longitudinal research on critical thinking in AI use.
Keywords
critical thinking, fact-checking, generative AI, LLM, misinformation, psychometric validation, scale
Discipline
Applied Behavior Analysis | Artificial Intelligence and Robotics | Social Psychology
Research Areas
Psychology
Publication
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Volume
22
First Page
1
Last Page
23
ISSN
2451-9588
Identifier
10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101103
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
LAU, Gabriel R., LOW, Wei Yan, TAY, Louis, GUEVARRA, Ysabel Thereze Ang, Gašević, Dragon, & HARTANTO, Andree.(2026). Understanding critical thinking in generative artificial intelligence use: Development, validation, and correlates of the critical thinking in AI use scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 22, 1-23.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4448
Copyright Owner and License
Authors-NC-ND
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101103
Included in
Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Commons, Social Psychology Commons