Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

5-2025

Abstract

This commentary responds to Wang et al.'s (2023) call for planetary rural geographies by attending to the neglected infrastructural dimensions. In so doing, we show how China's rural construction movement demonstrates Wang et al.'s (2023) three geographies of planetary rurality: as spaces of crisis, conflict, and hope. Simultaneously, we address how planetary rural thinking can foreground infrastructural geographies and their destabilization of urban-centered discourses, leading to a reconsideration of rural–urban relationality. We then identify new insights that critical infrastructural studies offer to planetary rural geographies. This includes an emphasis on the material grounds, hidden politics, and non-linear temporal patterns of rural–urban interactions. We conclude by suggesting that a global comparative study of rural construction movements can take the pluriversal planetary rural geographies agenda forward.

Keywords

China, Global comparison, Infrastructure, Planetary rural geographies, Rural construction movement, Rural–urban relations

Discipline

Asian Studies | Physical and Environmental Geography | Rural Sociology

Research Areas

Humanities

Publication

Dialogues in Human Geography

Volume

16

Issue

1

First Page

235

Last Page

239

ISSN

2043-8206

Identifier

10.1177/20438206251364983

Publisher

SAGE

Embargo Period

3-23-2026

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206251364983

Share

COinS