Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
6-2025
Abstract
Policy innovation labs (PILs) are relatively new policy actors and are part of a larger global “labification” movement. They are touted as spaces for the novel development and testing of policy solutions. PILs have evolved into various forms–including those at different levels of government (central, sub-national, and local), sectoral (such as food, transportation, and environment), and cross-sectoral labs (social innovation and data labs). After a decade, some practitioners lament the effectiveness of their efforts and question if policy labs are indeed engines of innovation and change. We argue that the approach to policy design by PILs, in part, is an explanation for their perceived ineffectiveness. It is unclear what their role is in the policy design process. From a sample of 149 PILs worldwide, we employ Cashore and Howlett’s (2007) 3 × 3 nine-dimensional hierarchical policy classification framework characterized by policy focus (abstract goals, program objectives, and micro policy goal targets) and policy means (instrumental logic, program mechanism, and tool calibration). Our website content analysis found that key PIL characteristics, namely their broad focus and oversight, had little to no influence on their policy design activity. We develop five policy design typologies from the above policy mix framework, namely “Classic Policy Designers,” “Advisors,” “Dreamers,” “Planners,” and “Technicians.” The remaining labs' policy design foci were too broad or misaligned.
Keywords
Policy innovation labs, Policy design, Website content analysis
Discipline
Political Science | Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Research Areas
Political Science
Publication
Policy Sciences
Volume
58
Issue
2
First Page
267
Last Page
286
ISSN
0032-2687
Identifier
10.1007/s11077-025-09577-6
Publisher
Springer
Citation
WELLSTEAD, Adam, GIEST, Sarah, & MUKHERJEE, Ishani.(2025). Peak policy lab or chasing windmills? The overlooked issue of misaligned policy design. Policy Sciences, 58(2), 267-286.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4285
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-025-09577-6
Included in
Political Science Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons