Beyond fact-checking: The importance of logic-checking in public discourse
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
9-2025
Abstract
This paper makes the case for what we call ‘logic-checking’. The paper begins by providing an overview of the development of fact-checking and of how fact-checking functions. As part of this discussion, we identify some limitations of fact-checking, including its reliance on testimony to function as intended. Such considerations, we argue, motivate logic-checking, which, when well articulated, can demonstrate that a piece of reasoning is flawed to an audience. What logic-checking involves is set out and examples of logic-checking are provided. The objection that experts in informal logic conducting logic-checking will be biased, thus undermining the whole enterprise, is considered and rejected.
Keywords
Fact-checking, Logic-checking, Fake news, Misinformation, Public discourse, Critical thinking
Discipline
Critical and Cultural Studies | Epistemology
Research Areas
Humanities; Integrative Research Areas
Publication
Social Epistemology
ISSN
0269-1728
Identifier
10.1080/02691728.2025.2549830
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Group
Citation
RYAN, Shane, & HAMMERTON, Matthew.(2025). Beyond fact-checking: The importance of logic-checking in public discourse. Social Epistemology, .
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4241
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2025.2549830