Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
6-2025
Abstract
The ability to resolve conflict is crucial for maintaining healthy relationships and psychological well-being. However, prior research has often overlooked the potential benefits of neuroticism for conflict resolution styles, due to a reliance on self-report measures and the lack of consideration of healthy neuroticism. This study examined the relationship between neuroticism and conflict resolution styles and highlights the pivotal role of conscientiousness and measurement modalities. Employing both self-reports and observer ratings of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory (CRSI), we analyzed data from young adults (N = 259) using structural equation modeling analysis. Self-reports indicated that neuroticism was associated with unconstructive conflict resolution strategies, whereas observer ratings revealed a positive association with constructive strategies. Conscientiousness moderated these relationships differently across measurement modalities, by buffering the negative aspects of neuroticism in self-reports and enhancing its positive aspects in observer ratings. These findings underscore the importance of measurement modalities and conscientiousness in understanding the benefits of neuroticism for conflict resolution.
Keywords
Conflict resolution style, neuroticism, conscientiousness, self-report, observer ratings, measurement modality
Discipline
Experimental Analysis of Behavior | Personality and Social Contexts
Research Areas
Psychology
Publication
Journal of Research in Personality
Volume
117
First Page
1
Last Page
12
ISSN
0092-6566
Identifier
10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104625
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
QUEK, Frosch Yi Xuan, YANG, Hwajin, & HARTANTO, Andree.(2025). Neuroticism predicts constructive conflict resolution styles in conscientious individuals: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings. Journal of Research in Personality, 117, 1-12.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/4214
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104625