Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

11-2021

Abstract

Bilinguals engage in qualitatively different code-switching patterns (alternation, insertion, and congruent lexicalization) to different degrees, according to their engagement in different types of interactional contexts (single-language context, dual-language context, and dense code-switching context). Drawing on the adaptive control hypothesis, we examined whether bilinguals’ code-switching patterns would differentially shape multiple aspects of cognitive control (interference control, salient cue detection, and opportunistic planning). We found that a dense code-switching context, which predominantly involves insertion and congruent lexicalization, was positively associated with verbal opportunistic planning but negatively associated with interference control and salient cue detection. In contrast, a dual-language context, which predominantly involves alternation, was not associated with interference control or salient cue detection, but with significantly reduced response times for opportunistic planning. Our findings partially corroborate the theoretical predictions of the adaptive control hypothesis. Altogether, our study illustrates the importance of bilinguals’ disparate code-switching practices in shaping cognitive control outcomes.

Keywords

bilingualism, code-switching, adaptive control hypothesis, alternation, insertion, congruent, lexicalization

Discipline

Cognition and Perception | Cognitive Psychology | Multicultural Psychology

Research Areas

Psychology

Publication

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition

Volume

52

Issue

3

First Page

521

Last Page

535

ISSN

1366-7289

Identifier

10.1017/S1366728921000754

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000754

Share

COinS