Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

2-2020

Abstract

Environmental historians have often been drawn to disasters. They have unearthed the often-forgotten stories of erupting volcanoes, raging rivers and rainless skies, and in so doing have reminded their colleagues from more anthropocentric disciplines that the societies, economies and cultures they study are part of broader physical systems. In addition to highlighting the agency of nature, however, disasters have also helped to remind us that environmental history remains at heart a humanistic discipline. It should never be simply a lament for lost natural habitats, but also a discipline which offers a unique prism through which to study people. It is perhaps for this reasons that environmental historians continue to use inherently anthropocentric words such as ‘disaster’ and ‘hazard’. These terms fail to recognise that disturbances that look catastrophic from the perspective of human beings might not have such negative effects when viewed from the perspective of an ecosystem. A forest fire or a flooded river might pose a hazard to an individual plant or animal that is burned or drowned as a consequence, yet in systemic terms neither is disastrous, as such physical processes offer other organisms in the vicinity opportunities to exploit new territories and sources of nutrition. Indeed, over time such disturbances can even promote the general biodiversity of an ecosystem.1 A disaster is, therefore, a relative concept, which offers a species-specific rather

Keywords

Asia, history, disaster

Discipline

Asian History | Asian Studies

Research Areas

Humanities

Publication

Environment and History

Volume

26

Issue

1

First Page

1

Last Page

6

ISSN

0967-3407

Identifier

10.3197/096734019X15755402985523

Publisher

White Horse Press

Copyright Owner and License

Publisher

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.3197/096734019X15755402985523

Download

Share

COinS