Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

1-2020

Abstract

Firms have increasingly used flexibility policies to facilitate work-life balance, yet existing research shows that employees are stigmatized for using these seemingly beneficial policies. In this article, the authors identify perceived control, that is, the sense of control employees feel they have over managing their work-life conflicts, as a key factor in their avoidance of flexibility policies. Through 50 in-depth interviews with management consultants from five firms, the authors find that employees frame managing their work-life conflicts as a test of their professional skills, emphasize their “natural” suitability for the consulting industry, use choice rhetoric to reframe oppressive work demands as personal choices, and accentuate their ability to exit the consulting industry if they are unable to manage their work-life balance independently. Empirically, this study provides a fuller explanation for the pervasive avoidance of flexibility policies and expands on prior explanations that focus on flexibility stigma.

Keywords

work-family policies, working time, overwork, qualitative methods, ideal worker

Discipline

Family, Life Course, and Society | Work, Economy and Organizations

Research Areas

Sociology

Publication

Industrial and Labor Relations Review

Volume

73

Issue

1

First Page

61

Last Page

90

ISSN

0019-7939

Identifier

10.1177/0019793919848426

Publisher

SAGE

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793919848426

Download

Share

COinS