Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

5-2018

Abstract

Constitutional interpretation generates intense debates over rights and powers. Countless U.S. Supreme Court decisions, articles, and books discuss these debates. With regard to powers, these debates often center around a nationalistic view of the U.S. Constitution, where the U.S. Congress has broad and expansive powers, or a states’ rights view of the document, where Congress has narrow and limited powers.1 With regards to rights, these debates often center around an emphasis on a moral reading of various clauses2 versus an emphasis on originalism

Discipline

Constitutional Law | Political Science

Research Areas

Political Science

Publication

UCLA Law Review Discourse

Volume

66

First Page

111

Last Page

136

ISSN

0041-5650

Publisher

UCLA School of Law

Additional URL

https://www.uclalawreview.org/two-foundings-thesis/

Share

COinS