Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

1-1999

Abstract

“No, dear, you must not eat the soap; it’s not good for you.” Well-intentioned interference frustrates our desires even in the happiest childhood. Less happy is the perpetual state of adolescent rebellion against apparently arbitrary and unreasonable curtailments of one’s freedom, too frequently justified by the familiar refrain “It’s for your own good” adding insult to injury. Such interference does not necessarily cease with the eagerly awaited entry into adulthood. Not only parents are guilty of it; the state also engages in such interference. Can paternalism where one person deliberately interferes with another for the latter’s own good be morally justified?

Keywords

Paternalism, J. S. Mill, state interference

Discipline

Philosophy

Research Areas

Humanities

Publication

Journal of Speculative Philosophy

Volume

13

Issue

1

First Page

56

Last Page

70

ISSN

0891-625X

Publisher

Penn State University Press

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://www.jstor.org/stable/25670276

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS