Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

8-2009

Abstract

In this essay, Steven Burik discusses Jacques Derrida's position with regard to the place of education in philosophy within the university system, and then relates these thoughts to comparative philosophy. Philosophers find themselves constantly having to defend philosophy and the importance of teaching philosophy against pressure from the powers that be. Burik contends that the argument Derrida set forth to "protect" philosophy entails a double bind: Derrida emphasized the value and importance of philosophical thinking while at the same time criticizing the limits of philosophy, both self-mandated and externally imposed. Derrida's defense of philosophy was anything but a protection of the status quo, according to Burik. Derrida ultimately argued that the teaching of philosophy and philosophy itself should be inherently open to new developments. Burik relates Derrida's defense of philosophy and attack on mainstream philosophy to comparative philosophy, demonstrating that both argue for an expansion of thinking beyond the narrow Western confines of philosophy as "pure" reason or rationality by showing how alterity always inserts itself, and that both seek to give this alterity a valid place in educational systems. © 2009 Board of Trustees | University of Illinois.

Discipline

Education | Philosophy

Research Areas

Humanities

Publication

Educational Theory

Volume

59

Issue

3

First Page

297

Last Page

312

ISSN

0013-2004

Identifier

10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00320.x

Publisher

Wiley: 6 months

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00320.x

Share

COinS