Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
1-1998
Abstract
Two standards of behavior are slugging it out around the world. Advocates of well-established norms such as corporate privacy and national sovereignty want to hide information from prying eyes, while promoters of transparency tout it as the solution to everything from international financial crises to arms races and street crime. Just what is transparency? Put simply, transparency is the opposite of secrecy. Secrecy means deliberately hiding your actions; transparency means deliberately revealing them. This element of volition makes the growing acceptance of transparency much more than a resigned surrender to the technologically facilitated intrusiveness of the Information Age. Transparency is a choice, encouraged by changing attitudes about what constitutes appropriate behavior.
Keywords
Government, Environmental regulation, Corporations, Environmental pollution, Pollutant emissions, Nongovernmental organizations, Business structures, Inventories, Sovereignty, Governance
Discipline
Political Science | Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Research Areas
Political Science
Publication
Foreign Policy
Volume
111
First Page
50
Last Page
63
ISSN
0015-7228
Identifier
10.2307/1149378
Publisher
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Citation
FLORINI, Ann.(1998). The end of secrecy. Foreign Policy, 111, 50-63.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2320
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.2307/1149378
Included in
Political Science Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons
Comments
Reprinted in Bernard I. Finel & Kristen M. Lord, eds. (2000). Power and conflict in the age of transparency. New York: St. Martin’s Press.