Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
9-2016
Abstract
Neil Sinhababu and I presented Backward Clock, anoriginal counterexample to Robert Nozick’s truth-tracking analysis ofpropositional knowledge. Fred Adams, John Barker and Murray Clarke argue that Backward Clock is no such counterexample. Theirargument fails to nullify Backward Clock whichalso shows that other tracking analyses, such as Dretske’s and one that Adams et al may well have in mind, are inadequate.
Keywords
Truth-tracking, Sensitive belief, Methods, Nozick, Dretske
Discipline
Epistemology | Philosophy
Research Areas
Humanities
Publication
Logos and Episteme: An International Journal of Epistemology
Volume
7
Issue
3
First Page
363
Last Page
378
ISSN
2069-0533
Identifier
10.5840/logos-episteme20167334
Publisher
Institutul European
Citation
WILLIAMS, John N..(2016). There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke. Logos and Episteme: An International Journal of Epistemology, 7(3), 363-378.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2009
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20167334