The validity of the Graduate Record Examination for master's and doctoral programs: A meta-analytic investigation
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
4-2010
Abstract
Extensive research has examined the effectiveness of admissions tests for use in higher education. What has gone unexamined is the extent to which tests are similarly effective for predicting performance at both the master’s and doctoral levels. This study empirically synthesizes previous studies to investigate whether or not the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) predicts the performance of students in master’s programs as well as the performance of doctoral students. Across nearly 100 studies and 10,000 students, this study found that GRE scores predict first year grade point average (GPA), graduate GPA, and faculty ratings well for both master’s and doctoral students, with differences that ranged from small to zero.
Keywords
graduate school, admissions tests, validity, Graduate Record Examination, GRE, meta-analysis, standardized tests
Discipline
Higher Education | Quantitative Psychology
Research Areas
Psychology
Publication
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Volume
70
Issue
2
First Page
340
Last Page
352
ISSN
0013-1644
Identifier
10.1177/0013164409344508
Publisher
SAGE Publications (UK and US)
Citation
KUNCEL, Nathan R., WEE, Serena, SERAFIN, Lauren, & HEZLETT, Sarah A..(2010). The validity of the Graduate Record Examination for master's and doctoral programs: A meta-analytic investigation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 340-352.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1882
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409344508