Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
5-2010
Abstract
A fundamental problem faced by employers is how to elicit effort from employees. Most economic models suggest that employers meet this challenge by monitoring employees carefully to prevent shirking. But there is another option that relies on heterogeneity across employees, and that is to screen job candidates to find workers with a stronger work ethic who require less monitoring. We might therefore expect employers who screen candidates more intensively to monitor them less. Using data from a national sample of US employers, we find that employers who screen applicants more intensively for factors that should predict work ethic also monitor employees less and also make greater use of systems such as teamwork where monitoring by supervisors is more difficult. This screening is also associated with higher wages, higher employee productivity, and lower involuntary turnover rates. Screening for other attributes, such as work experiences and academic performance, does not produce these results.
Keywords
Employee Screening, Monitoring, Work Ethic, High Performance Work Practices, Principal-Agent Model.
Discipline
Asian Studies | Behavioral Economics | Labor Economics
Research Areas
Applied Microeconomics
Publication
American Economic Review
Volume
100
Issue
2
First Page
214
Last Page
218
ISSN
0002-8282
Identifier
10.1257/aer.100.2.214
Publisher
American Economic Association
Citation
HUANG, Fali and Cappelli, Peter.
Applicant Screening and Performance-Related Outcomes. (2010). American Economic Review. 100, (2), 214-218.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/5
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.214