Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
3-2007
Abstract
Explicit asymptotic bias formulae are given for dynamic panel regression estimators as the cross section sample size N --> ∞. The results extend earlier work by Nickell [1981. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49, 1417-1426] and later authors in several directions that are relevant for practical work, including models with unit roots, deterministic trends, predetermined and exogenous regressors, and errors that may be cross sectionally dependent. The asymptotic bias is found to be so large when incidental linear trends are fitted and the time series sample size is small that it changes the sign of the autoregressive coefficient. Another finding of interest is that, when there is cross section error dependence, the probability limit of the dynamic panel regression estimator is a random variable rather than a constant, which helps to explain the substantial variability observed in dynamic panel estimates when there is cross section dependence even in situations where N is very large. Some proposals for bias correction are suggested and finite sample performance is analyzed in simulations.
Keywords
Autoregression, Bias, Bias correction, Cross section dependence, Dynamic factors, Dynamic panel estimation, Incidental trends, Panel unit root
Discipline
Econometrics
Research Areas
Econometrics
Publication
Journal of Econometrics
Volume
137
Issue
1
First Page
162
Last Page
188
ISSN
0304-4076
Identifier
10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.03.009
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
PHILLIPS, Peter C. B. and SUL, Donggyu.
Bias in dynamic panel estimation with fixed effects, incidental trends and cross section dependence. (2007). Journal of Econometrics. 137, (1), 162-188.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/284
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.03.009