Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

8-2021

Abstract

We investigate whether judicial decisions are affected by career concerns of judges by analyzing two questions: Do judges respond to incentives to pander by ruling in favor of the government in the hope of receiving jobs after retiring from the Supreme Court? Does the government reward judges who rule in its favor with prestigious jobs? We construct a data set of Supreme Court of India cases involving the government for 1999–2014. We find that incentives to pander have a causal effect on judicial decision-making, and they are jointly determined by the importance of the case and whether the judge retires with enough time left in a government’s term to be rewarded with a prestigious job. We also find that authoring favorable judgments increases the likelihood of being appointed to prestigious post–Supreme Court jobs. This suggests the presence of corruption in the form of government influence over judicial decisions.

Keywords

Courts, judges, corruption, India

Discipline

Asian Studies | Courts | Public Economics

Research Areas

Applied Microeconomics

Publication

Journal of Law and Economics

Volume

64

First Page

479

Last Page

511

ISSN

0022-2186

Identifier

10.1086/713728

Publisher

University of Chicago Press

Embargo Period

1-6-2023

Copyright Owner and License

Publisher

Comments

See full text of working paper version at https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1928

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1086/713728

Share

COinS