Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

10-2007

Abstract

This paper compares relative performance evaluation via tournaments to absolute performance evaluation via piece rates when agents are heterogeneous ex post, to make the point that agent heterogeneity compromises the insurance function of tournaments. In particular, we show that the more heterogeneous agents are the less insurance can be offered through tournaments and the less dominant tournaments are over piece rates. Thus, absolute performance piece rates should be preferred when agents are highly heterogeneous. However, even with heterogeneous agents, tournaments become more desirable when the number of agents or the uncertainty about the common shock increases sufficiently.

Discipline

Economic Theory

Research Areas

Economic Theory

Publication

Economics Bulletin

Volume

4

Issue

41

First Page

1

Last Page

9

ISSN

1545-2921

Publisher

Economics Bulletin

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Share

COinS