Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
1-2011
Abstract
In a team project with significant complementarities between various players' individual tasks, news of early success by some encourages others to push ahead with their own tasks while lack of success has the opposite effect. This ex-post disparity in incentives created gives rise to two differing implications, ex ante, for an ideal team transparency. Sometimes it is better to commit to complete secrecy within the team of the various participants' interim progress as it mitigates the negative effect of failures. In some other situations, commitment to full disclosure is better as players are then encouraged to be proactive by exerting efforts in the early rounds and motivate other team members into continued activities by way of interim progress. Transparency (of outcomes) thus has double edges -- it can boost incentives or dampen incentives.
Keywords
Team project, Complementarity of tasks, Transparency of outcomes, Markov strategies
Discipline
Behavioral Economics | Economics
Research Areas
Applied Microeconomics
Publication
Journal of Public Economics
Volume
95
Issue
7-8
First Page
531
Last Page
542
ISSN
0047-2727
Identifier
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.01.009
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
BAG, Parimal and PEPITO, Nona.
Double-edged transparency in teams. (2011). Journal of Public Economics. 95, (7-8), 531-542.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/2323
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.01.009