Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
9-2012
Abstract
This paper proposes a theory of city size distribution via a hierarchy approach rather than the popular random growth process. It does so by formalizing central place theory using an equilibrium entry model and specifying the conditions under which city size distribution follows a power law. Central place theory describes the way in which a hierarchical city system with different layers of cities serving differently sized market areas is formed from a uniformly populated space. The force driving the city size differences in this model is the heterogeneity in economies of scale across goods. The city size distribution under a central place hierarchy exhibits a power law if the distribution of scale economies is regularly varying, which is a general class that encompasses many well-known, commonly used distributions. This model is also consistent with a power law for firms and a number-average-size rule, which is the log-linear relationship between the number and average size of the cities in which an industry is located.
Keywords
Central place theory, power law, Zipf’s law, regular variation, number-averagesize rule, fractal structure
Discipline
Behavioral Economics | Growth and Development | Urban Studies and Planning
Research Areas
Applied Microeconomics
Publication
Economic Journal
Volume
122
Issue
563
First Page
903
Last Page
932
ISSN
0013-0133
Identifier
10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02518.x
Publisher
Wiley
Citation
HSU, Wen-Tai.
Central place theory and city size distribution. (2012). Economic Journal. 122, (563), 903-932.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1994
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02518.x
Included in
Behavioral Economics Commons, Growth and Development Commons, Urban Studies and Planning Commons
Comments
See concise video made by the Royal Economic Society where the author explains the paper.