Human Fallibility and Sequential Decision-Making: Hierarchy Versus Polyarchy
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
1992
Abstract
Decisions in organizations are often jointly made by individuals whose interests need not coincide. Even if they do, the quality of the decision depends crucially on the manner in which individual opinions are aggregated. This paper develops a model to analyse joint decision-making in large organizations under the key assumption that perfect information is impossible, so that human fallibility is present. The aim of the paper is to formalise some of the intuition associated with sequential decision-making in two stylised decision structures, namely: hierarchy and polyarchy. Incentive problems in the presence of human fallibility are also considered.
Discipline
Economics
Research Areas
Applied Microeconomics
Publication
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Volume
18
Issue
3
First Page
317
Last Page
345
ISSN
0167-2681
Identifier
10.1016/0167-2681(92)90014-3
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Koh, Winston T. H..
Human Fallibility and Sequential Decision-Making: Hierarchy Versus Polyarchy. (1992). Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 18, (3), 317-345.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/188
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(92)90014-3