"Inferiority" Complex? Policing, Private Precautions and Crime
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
2-2015
Abstract
I link the idea that greater state policing induces private neglect of safety precautions (moral hazard) with the concept of “inferior inputs” in the production function literature. I model crime prevention as an outcome of two “inputs”—policing (a public good) and private security expenses. I show that if cost-minimizing individuals choose insufficient private expenses to completely deter crimes, a rise in policing raises criminals’ probability of success if and only if policing is an “inferior input” in crime prevention. This is so even though the marginal productivity of policing is always positive, and works through a strong moral hazard effect. I discuss implications for policy-makers.
Keywords
Policing, Crime, Moral hazard, Inferior inputs, Private precautions, Public goods
Discipline
Economics
Research Areas
Applied Microeconomics
Publication
European Journal of Law and Economics
Volume
39
Issue
1
First Page
97
Last Page
106
ISSN
0929-1261
Identifier
10.1007/s10657-013-9408-x
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Citation
GUHA, Brishti.
"Inferiority" Complex? Policing, Private Precautions and Crime. (2015). European Journal of Law and Economics. 39, (1), 97-106.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1508
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-013-9408-x