Publication Type

Working Paper

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

4-2012

Abstract

Why do agents engage in costly dispute resolution such as litigation and arbitration when costless settlement is available? I present a model with one sided asymmetric information where the payoff from litigation for both agents depends on the beliefs of the uninformed agent. Taking these payoffs as their outside options, agents negotiate over the allocation of an indivisible object that is in dispute and transfers. It is shown that it is impossible to implement an allocation that satisfies budget balance that guarantees the agents their payoff from conflict when agents can quit negotiations unilaterally at any stage.

Discipline

Labor Economics

Research Areas

Economic Theory

First Page

1

Last Page

30

Publisher

SMU Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series, No. 18-2012

City or Country

Singapore

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Share

COinS