Publication Type

Case note/Digest

Publication

Singapore Law Journal (Lexicon)

Publication Date

9-2025

Abstract

In Foo Kian Beng v OP3 International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) [2024] 1 SLR 361, the Singapore Court of Appeal introduced a two-step, three-category framework for evaluating whether a director has breached his fiduciary duty to consider the interests of creditors. This decision not only affirms the traditional understanding of the duty in other common law jurisdictions but also provides directors with clearer guidance on managing the affairs of the company in times of financial distress. This article builds upon the discussion in Foo Kian Beng by evaluating the new framework established by the SGCA. It also identifies potential challenges that may arise in applying the framework, namely (a) the valuation of contingent assets and liabilities, (b) the appropriate test for insolvency, and (c) the relevance of the statutory insolvency regime.

Keywords

directors’ duties, fiduciary duty, creditors’ interests, insolvency, Singapore Court of Appeal, corporate governance, financial distress, company law, contingent liabilities, statutory insolvency regime

Disciplines

Bankruptcy Law | Business Organizations Law | Commercial Law

Subject(s)

Applied or Integration/Application Scholarship

ISSN/ISBN

2737-5048

Publisher

SMU Lexicon, SMU School of Law

Version

publishedVersion

Copyright Holder

Singapore Management University

Format

application/PDF

Volume

5

Page

128-152

Share

COinS