Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

1-2025

Abstract

The two most common paradigms to identify records of preference in a multi-objective setting rely either on dominance (e.g., the skyline operator) or on a utility function defined over the records' attributes (typically, using a top-k query). Despite their proliferation, each of them has its own palpable drawbacks. Motivated by these drawbacks, we identify three hard requirements for practical decision support, namely, personalization, controllable output size, and flexibility in preference specification. With these requirements as a guide, we combine elements from both paradigms and propose two new operators, ORD and ORU. We perform a qualitative study to demonstrate how they work, and evaluate their performance against adaptations of previous work that mimic their output.

Keywords

Top-k query, skyline, multi-dimensional datasets

Discipline

Computer Sciences | Databases and Information Systems

Research Areas

Data Science and Engineering

Areas of Excellence

Digital transformation

Publication

ACM Transactions on Database Systems

Volume

50

Issue

1

First Page

1

Last Page

37

ISSN

0362-5915

Identifier

10.1145/3705726

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1145/3705726

Share

COinS