Publication Type
Conference Proceeding Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
7-2020
Abstract
Predicting the political bias and the factuality of reporting of entire news outlets are critical elements of media profiling, which is an understudied but an increasingly important research direction. The present level of proliferation of fake, biased, and propagandistic content online has made it impossible to fact-check every single suspicious claim, either manually or automatically. Thus, it has been proposed to profile entire news outlets and to look for those that are likely to publish fake or biased content. This makes it possible to detect likely “fake news” the moment they are published, by simply checking the reliability of their source. From a practical perspective, political bias and factuality of reporting have a linguistic aspect but also a social context. Here, we study the impact of both, namely (i) what was written (i.e., what was published by the target medium, and how it describes itself in Twitter) vs. (ii) who reads it (i.e., analyzing the target medium’s audience on social media). We further study (iii) what was written about the target medium (in Wikipedia). The evaluation results show that what was written matters most, and we further show that putting all information sources together yields huge improvements over the current state-of-the-art.
Keywords
Computation and Language, Information Retrieval, Machine Learning
Discipline
Programming Languages and Compilers
Research Areas
Data Science and Engineering; Information Systems and Management
Publication
Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
First Page
3364
Last Page
3374
Identifier
10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.308
Publisher
ACL
City or Country
Pennsylvania
Citation
1
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.