Publication Type
Conference Proceeding Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
5-2026
Abstract
Reflective learning enhances understanding, especially when instructors promptly address difficulties raised in student reflections. Automated doubt detection can reduce time for instructors, yet existing classification approaches take substantial time for manual annotation and model training. This paper investigates whether large and small language models (LLMs, SLMs) can automate doubt detection without time-consuming training. Using a dataset of anonymized student reflections, we evaluate zeroshot, few-shot prompting, and multi-step reasoning against prior supervised classification baselines. We show that LLMs (GPT-4o, Claude-4, Gemini-2.5) surpass earlier F1 scores without prompting, while prompting further improves their performance. However, using proprietary LLMs can raise cost and privacy concerns. We also show that selected SLMs (Mistral, Qwen) outperform baselines while addressing these concerns. We extend the analysis with a category-level error study, showing that explicit doubts are detected more reliably, while tentative doubts (softened by cautious language), learning challenge (arising from difficulties in applying concepts), and masked doubts (concealed by positive or polite phrasing) are missed more often. These findings highlight both the promise and limitations of language models for doubt detection and the need to ensure that cautious or polite learners who may not express their doubts explicitly are recognized and supported in learning analytics systems.
Keywords
Doubt Identification, Reflective Learning, LLM, Generative AI, Prompt Design and Engineering
Discipline
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Research Areas
Intelligent Systems and Optimization
Areas of Excellence
Digital transformation
Publication
LAK '26: Proceedings of the LAK26: 16th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, Bergen, Norway, April 27 - May 1
First Page
117
Last Page
126
ISBN
9798400720666
Identifier
10.1145/3785022.3785037
Publisher
ACM
City or Country
New York
Citation
OUH, Eng Lieh; TAN, Kar Way; LO, Siaw Ling; and ZHANG, Yuhao.
Detecting doubt in reflective learning: A learning analytics study with large and small language models. (2026). LAK '26: Proceedings of the LAK26: 16th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, Bergen, Norway, April 27 - May 1. 117-126.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/11217
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1145/3785022.3785037