"Quid Pro Quo: An exploration of reciprocity in code review" by Carlos Gavidia-Calderon, DongGyun HAN et al.
 

Publication Type

Conference Proceeding Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

5-2022

Abstract

We explore the role of reciprocity in code review processes. Reciprocity manifests itself in two ways: 1) reviewing code for others translates to accepted code contributions, and 2) having contributions accepted increases the reviews made for others. We use vector autoregressive (VAR) models to explore the causal relation between reviews performed and accepted contributions. After fitting VAR models for 24 active open-source developers, we found evidence of reciprocity in 6 of them. These results suggest reciprocity does play a role in code review, that can potentially be exploited to increase reviewer participation.

Keywords

code review, collaboration, time series analysis

Discipline

Software Engineering

Publication

MSR '22: Proceedings of the Mining Software Repositories Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, May 21-24

First Page

738

Last Page

740

ISBN

9781450393034

Identifier

10.1145/3524842.3528522

Publisher

ACM

City or Country

New York

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1145/3524842.3528522

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 1
  • Usage
    • Abstract Views: 7
  • Captures
    • Readers: 1
see details

Share

COinS