Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
4-2020
Abstract
Interim CEOs are often viewed as caretakers during CEO transition periods. However, the caretaker function does not fully explain the increasing trend in the use of interim CEO appointments. Recent studies suggest that firms also use the interim position to test potential CEO candidates. This paper empirically examines this argument using a hand-collected dataset of 1936 CEO successions between 1994 and 2014. We find evidence that firms consider interim positions as a testing ground for CEO candidates. Specifically, we find that candidates with uncertain managerial abilities are more likely to be initially named as interim CEOs rather than permanent CEOs. We also find that interim CEOs are more likely to be promoted to the permanent CEO position when they have better interim-period performance attributable to managerial skills. Consistent with the testing-ground option hypothesis, we find interim CEOs promoted to the permanent position result in superior long-run performance, suggesting better CEO-firm matches.
Keywords
CEO turnover, Interim CEO, Testing-ground option
Discipline
Corporate Finance
Research Areas
Finance
Publication
Journal of Corporate Finance
Volume
61
First Page
1
Last Page
19
ISSN
0929-1199
Identifier
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.11.003
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
HE, Xiaoxiao and ZHU, Rui.
Are interim CEOs just caretakers?. (2020). Journal of Corporate Finance. 61, 1-19.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7944
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.11.003