Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
submittedVersion
Publication Date
7-2025
Abstract
Initiatives to implement AI technologies in organizations fail at an alarming rate. We argue that leading the adoption of AI is not a simple engineering exercise but rather represents a behavioral exercise where change management principles—the process by which organizations plan, implement, and embed changes in practices—are employed. However, many AI initiatives in business focus predominantly on the AI systems themselves, assuming humans will fall in line. To solve this, we integrate ideas from change management with scholarship on human-centered artificial intelligence to offer a behavioral approach that accounts for the impact of AI adoption on humans at all stages of implementation and change management (design, adoption, and management). We argue that this approach is necessary to curtail the staggeringly high failure rate of AI adoption initiatives and ensure the successful long-term integration of AI in organizations.
Keywords
Change management, Cognitive bias, Decision making, Human centered artificial intelligence
Discipline
Human Resources Management | Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Organizational Behavior and Theory | Psychology
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
First Page
1
Last Page
12
ISSN
1044-7318
Identifier
10.1080/10447318.2025.2531287
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Group
Citation
SCHWEITZER, Shane; NARAYAN, Devesh; MCGUIRE, Jack; and DE CREMER, David.
Leading AI adoption in organizations: Introducing a behavioral human-centered approach. (2025). International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 1-12.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7798
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2531287
Included in
Human Resources Management Commons, Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons