Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
1-2024
Abstract
A key insight from research on organizational justice is that fairness is in the eye of the beholder. With increasing discussions–especially among computer scientists and policymakers–about the potential biases and unfairness of decisions made by Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, there is a critical need to consider how decision-subjects perceive the fairness of AI-led decision-making. Drawing upon theoretical and empirical perspectives on perceived fairness in organizational justice scholarship, this review categorizes and analyzes perceptions of AI fairness as they impact the effective implementation of AI in workplaces and beyond. Specifically, we review existing empirical research on AI fairness according to distinct dimensions of perceived fairness–distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational–with a focus on its potential to inform organizational decision-making. In doing so, we provide new insights and offer directions for future interdisciplinary research in this burgeoning field.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence, Organizational justice, Perceived fairness
Discipline
Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Organizational Behavior and Theory | Psychology
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Volume
40
Issue
1
ISSN
1044-7318
Identifier
10.1080/10447318.2023.2210890
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Group
Citation
NARAYANAN, Devesh; NAGPAL, Mahak; MCGUIRE, Jack; SCHWEITZER, Shane; and DE CREMER, David.
Fairness perceptions of artificial intelligence: A review and path forward. (2024). International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 40, (1),.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7797
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Included in
Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons