"Well-being of formal leaders: A critical and interdisciplinary review " by Burak OC and KRAIVIN PARIPONT CHINTAKANANDA
 

Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

3-2025

Abstract

Holding a formal leadership role is often idealized, motivating individuals to pursue such positions for independence and success. However, recent reports highlight significant challenges faced by leaders, particularly during as well as after the COVID-19 pandemic, including increased work demands and reduced well-being. This review takes a critical stance and examines whether formal leaders bear a well-being cost. Using Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) ecological systems framework, we categorize predictors of leader well-being, discuss dominant theoretical frameworks explaining the most frequently studied relationships, and identify theoretical gaps in the existing literature. Following this, we identify internal validity issues affecting the interpretation of existing research. Our findings reveal significant validity concerns and a reliance on single-study, non-experimental designs, compromising the reliability of results. We offer theoretical and methodological recommendations for future research and emphasize the need for interventions to enhance leader well-being amidst increasing role demands. By synthesizing existing knowledge, our review aims to be a valuable resource for leadership scholars and practitioners, fostering interdisciplinary insights and encouraging further research on leader well-being in diverse contexts.

Keywords

Leader well-being, Critical Review, Internal Validity, Interdisciplinary

Discipline

Leadership Studies | Organizational Behavior and Theory

Research Areas

Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources

Publication

Leadership Quarterly

Volume

36

Issue

1

First Page

1

Last Page

20

ISSN

1048-9843

Identifier

10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101842

Publisher

Elsevier

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101842

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 2
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 38
    • Abstract Views: 29
  • Captures
    • Readers: 21
  • Mentions
    • News Mentions: 2
see details

Share

COinS