Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
3-2024
Abstract
We compare the efficacy of two broad approaches to entrepreneurship training: a training prioritizing demand-side activities versus a training prioritizing resource-side activities. We do so by running a field experiment inside a 6-month entrepreneurship program involving 236 early-stage entrepreneurs. Inspired by our training, the first group invested more time interacting with potential customers and developing a deep understanding of customer needs and problems. The other group, in contrast, spent more time identifying and exploiting their core resources such as their network. Our results reveal that the training prioritizing demand-side activities is substantially more effective. At the end of the program, the group exposed to the demand-side training acquired more than twice the number of customers and generated revenues 65% higher than the other group.
Keywords
demand-side perspective, early-stage entrepreneurs, entrepreneurship training, field experiment, resource based view
Discipline
Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations | Strategic Management Policy
Research Areas
Strategy and Organisation
Publication
Strategic Management Journal
Volume
45
Issue
3
First Page
564
Last Page
587
ISSN
0143-2095
Identifier
10.1002/smj.3560
Publisher
Wiley
Citation
SANTAMARIA, Simone; ABOLFATHI, Niloofar; and MAHMOOD, Ishtiag Pasha.
Demand pull versus resource push training approaches to entrepreneurship: A field experiment. (2024). Strategic Management Journal. 45, (3), 564-587.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7337
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3560
Included in
Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations Commons, Strategic Management Policy Commons