Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
5-2023
Abstract
Business ethics research has long examined the dichotomy between remaining silent or reporting ethical misconduct to a third party. Little is known, however, about ethical conversations within a work group after observing misconduct. Specifically, we do not know how many members of their work group individuals choose to communicate with. These conversations could have important implications for creating an ethical workplace. We propose that psychological standing is an important driver of individuals' decisions not to remain silent and to instead raise moral concerns with a greater number of others in their work group. In addition, integrating existing work on structural power, psychological standing, and the bystander effect, we develop a moderated mediation model with both structural power position and work group size as contextual drivers of psychological standing. Our model is supported across four studies using different designs and methodological approaches. Our results contribute to the understanding of when and why individuals raise moral concerns, and they provide insights into how an ethical context is created in organizations.
Keywords
Number of targets, Psychological standing, Power, Bystander effect
Discipline
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
Journal of Business Ethics
First Page
1
Last Page
12
ISSN
0167-4544
Identifier
10.1007/s10551-023-05431-y
Publisher
Springer Verlag (Germany)
Citation
OC, Burak and KOUCHAKI, Maryam.
The more the merrier: How psychological standing and work group size explain managers' willingness to communicate about unethical conduct in their work group. (2023). Journal of Business Ethics. 1-12.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7304
Copyright Owner and License
Authors-CC-BY
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05431-y
Included in
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons