Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
8-2017
Abstract
The study aims to explore why some societies are more innovative than others in high-technology sectors. Following a crossvergence perspective, we generate nine causal conditions by accommodating both cultural and institutional varieties: uncertainty avoidance, masculinity, individualism and power distance as culture indicators, and union density, skill development, market capitalization to credit, prevalence of cluster and state dominance as institutional indicators. Applying the configurational approach, we conducted fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) on Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries. We confirm the equal importance of both cultural and institutional mechanisms as contributors to national innovativeness, and identify equifinal configurations of cultural and institutional varieties as leading to a high-tech society. The implication is that a society can adjust or develop various cultural and/or institutional conditions to maintain or create leadership in innovation.
Keywords
Innovation, Cultural dimensions, Comparative institutional varieties, Crossvergence, Fuzzy set methods
Discipline
Organizational Behavior and Theory | Strategic Management Policy | Technology and Innovation
Research Areas
Strategy and Organisation
Publication
Technovation
Volume
66-67
First Page
43
Last Page
56
ISSN
0166-4972
Identifier
10.1016/j.technovation.2017.05.003
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
FAN, Di; LI, Yi; and CHEN, Liang.
Configuring innovative societies: The crossvergent role of cultural and institutional varieties. (2017). Technovation. 66-67, 43-56.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7290
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.05.003
Included in
Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons, Strategic Management Policy Commons, Technology and Innovation Commons