Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

submittedVersion

Publication Date

6-2023

Abstract

Mindfulness is known to temper negative reactions by both victims and perpetrators of injustice. Accordingly, critics claim that mindfulness numbs people to injustice, raising concerns about its moral implications. Exam-ining how mindful observers respond to third-party injustice, we integrate mindfulness with deontic justice theory to propose that mindfulness does not numb but rather enlivens people to injustice committed by others against others. Results from three studies show that mindfulness heightens moral outrage in witnesses of injustice, particularly when the injustice is only moderate. Although these findings did not replicate with a mindfulness induction, post-hoc analysis in a fourth study reveals that measured state mindfulness perhaps heightens moral outrage when observers have a weak deontic justice orientation. In documenting this moral enlivening effect, we demonstrate that mindfulness - measured as a state or trait - leads people to exact greater deontic retribution against perpetrators of third-party injustice.

Keywords

Mindfulness, Third -party justice, Vicarious mistreatment, Deontic justice, Moral outrage, Emotion regulation, Self -transcendence, Retribution, Punishment, Intuition

Discipline

Human Resources Management | Organizational Behavior and Theory | Social Psychology and Interaction

Research Areas

Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources

Publication

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volume

176

First Page

1

Last Page

20

ISSN

0749-5978

Identifier

10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104249

Publisher

Elsevier

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104249

Download

Share

COinS