Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
8-2023
Abstract
Cultural tightness theory, which holds that “tight” cultures have rigid norms and sanctions, provides unique insights into cultural variations. However, current theorizing has not analyzed gender differences in cultural tightness. Addressing this gap, this research shows that women are more constrained than men by norms within the same society. By recruiting 15,425 respondents, we mapped state-level gender bias in cultural tightness across the United States. Variability in gender bias in cultural tightness was associated with state-level socio-political factors (religion and political ideology) and gender-related threats. Gender bias in cultural tightness was positively associated with state-level gender inequality in (business and political) leadership and innovation, two major challenges faced by women professionals. Overall, this research advances cultural tightness theory and offers a cultural norms account on persistent gender inequalities in society.
Keywords
cultural tightness-looseness, gender inequality, gender bias, leadership, innovation, United States
Discipline
Gender and Sexuality | Leadership Studies | Organizational Behavior and Theory | Technology and Innovation
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
PNAS Nexus
Volume
2
Issue
8
First Page
1
Last Page
17
ISSN
2752-6542
Identifier
10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad238
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Embargo Period
7-26-2023
Citation
QIN, Xin; CHUA, Roy Y. J.; TAN, Ling; LI, Wanlu; and CHEN, Chen.
Gender bias in cultural tightness across the 50 U.S. states and its links to gender inequality in leadership and innovation. (2023). PNAS Nexus. 2, (8), 1-17.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7238
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad238
Included in
Gender and Sexuality Commons, Leadership Studies Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons, Technology and Innovation Commons