Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
10-2019
Abstract
Four experiments supported by six supplemental studies show that premium but higher-priced products (e.g., direct flights, larger-capacity data storage devices) are more popular when the additional cost is made explicit using differential price framing (DPF; e.g., "for $20 more") rather than being left implicit, as in standard inclusive price framing (IPF; e.g., "for $60 total"). The DPF effect is driven by pricing focalism: relative to IPF, DPF creates a focus on the price difference, which, because it is smaller than the total price, leads to lower perceived expensiveness and thus greater choice share for the premium option. This price framing effect is robust to displaying the total cost of the purchase, bad deals, and easy-to-compute price differences, and it appears to be uniquely effective in pricing contexts. However, DPF effects are reduced among consumers who adopt a slow and effortful decision process. These findings have implications for research on price partitioning, the design of effective pricing strategy, the sources of expensiveness perceptions in the marketplace, and consumer welfare.
Keywords
attribute framing, expensiveness, heuristic processing, price partitioning, pricing strategy
Discipline
Marketing
Research Areas
Marketing
Publication
Journal of Marketing Research
Volume
56
Issue
5
First Page
826
Last Page
841
ISSN
0022-2437
Identifier
10.1177/0022243719851490
Publisher
American Marketing Association
Citation
ALLARD, Thomas; HARDISTY, David J.; and GRIFFIN, Dale.
When "more" seems like less: Differential price framing increases the choice share of higher-priced options. (2019). Journal of Marketing Research. 56, (5), 826-841.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7035
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
External URL
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719851490