Publication Type
Book Chapter
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
1-2018
Abstract
This chapter examines whether CSR investments occur mostly in firms with severe agency problems, which suggests that CSR is an agency issue. We demonstrate that this is not the case: CSR investments and performance are higher when dividends are high, leverage is high, cash flows and cash holdings are low, and when there is a high managerial pay-for-performance sensitivity. All these variables combined represent managerial discipline in terms of corporate investing. We also document that better legal protection of shareholder rights is positively related to CSR performance. This implies that when shareholders are more powerful relative to the management, the firms still make CSR investments, which is an indication that CSR investments are not likely to destroy value. Moreover, we find a direct positive relation between CSR investments and shareholder value (measured by Tobin’s Q). Overall, our results based on instrumental variable estimation refute the view that CSR is a manifestation of managerial agency problems.
Keywords
Corporate Social Responsibility, CEO turnover, Corporate Governance
Discipline
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics | Corporate Finance
Research Areas
Finance
Publication
Research handbook of finance and sustainability
Editor
S. Boubaker, D. Cumming, & D. K. Nguyen
First Page
54
Last Page
71
ISBN
9781786432629
Identifier
10.4337/9781786432636.00010
Publisher
E. Elgar
City or Country
Cheltemham
Citation
LIANG, Hao and RENNEBOOG, Luc.
Is corporate social responsibility an agency problem?. (2018). Research handbook of finance and sustainability. 54-71.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6532
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432636.00010