Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
1-2022
Abstract
Prior research assumes that high-status actors have greater organizational influence than lower-status ones, that is, it is easier for the former to get their ideas and initiatives adopted by the organization than it is for the latter. Drawing from the literature on ideology, we posit that the status-influence link is contingent on actors’ ideological position. Specifically, status confers organizational influence to the degree that the focal actor is ideologically mainstream. The more an actor’s ideology deviates from the mainstream the less will her status translate into increased organizational influence. We find support for this hypothesis using data on the work of legislators in the House of Representatives in the U.S. Congress. By illuminating how and under what conditions status leads to increased influence, this study qualifies and extends current understandings of the role of status in organizations.
Keywords
Status, influence, ideology, social capital, congress
Discipline
Applied Behavior Analysis | Social Influence and Political Communication | Strategic Management Policy
Research Areas
Strategy and Organisation
Publication
Organization Studies
Volume
43
Issue
1
First Page
35
Last Page
57
ISSN
0170-8406
Identifier
10.1177/0170840620907201
Publisher
SAGE
Citation
COLLET, Francois; CARNABUCI, Gianluca; ERTUG, Gokhan; and ZOU, Tengjian.
Ideological boundaries of status advantages: Legislative effectiveness in the House of Representatives in the United States Congress. (2022). Organization Studies. 43, (1), 35-57.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6508
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620907201
Included in
Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Social Influence and Political Communication Commons, Strategic Management Policy Commons