Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
2-2019
Abstract
Coalitions are important in organizational decision making, but the question of how coalitions are built and make decisions in response to firm performance is still not sufficiently explored. In this study, we develop and test theory on how potential coalitions are built through shared experience and recruitment of allies. When organizations respond to performance relative to aspiration levels, either as problemistic search following low performance or opportunity exploration following high performance, members form coalitions to influence decisions. We develop theory of coalition formation that builds on upper echelons theory and the theory of dominant coalitions to predict how past experience of decision makers leads to preferred actions by each member and subsequent coalition formation. We use this theory to make new measures of potential coalitions and apply it to acquisitions made by firms in China. We find evidence that the experience of members of the key decision making group—the board of directors—affects the potential coalition building, and hence the type of acquisition target, as predicted.
Discipline
Organizational Behavior and Theory | Strategic Management Policy
Research Areas
Strategy and Organisation
Publication
Academy of Management Journal
Volume
62
Issue
1
First Page
44
Last Page
65
ISSN
0001-4273
Identifier
10.5465/amj.2017.0323
Publisher
Academy of Management
Citation
ZHANG, Cyndi Man and GREVE, Henrich R..
Dominant coalitions directing acquisitions: Different decision makers, different decisions. (2019). Academy of Management Journal. 62, (1), 44-65.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6207
Copyright Owner and License
Publisher
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0323