Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
3-2006
Abstract
The contingency theory of conflict management and current crisis management literature are integrated in this paper to examine how crisis has been communi-cated and managed by the Singapore government and what kinds of strategies arose during the various stages of the SARS crisis life-cycle. Findings show that the Singapore government played a predominant role in managing how its multiple publics perceived the crisis by extensive communication through the news media. The media, in turn, playing a supporting nation-building role, assisted the government's management and communication of the crisis. To effectively manage the perception and emotion of the various public, the government had recourse to more accommodative stances. Accommodation embedded in advocacy was the operational approach adopted by the govern-ment in order to move its multiple publics in the same strategic direction along an continuum of accommodation.
Keywords
Crisis Communication, Singapore, Media, Contingency Theory, SARS, Publics
Discipline
Asian Studies | Business and Corporate Communications | Social Influence and Political Communication
Research Areas
Corporate Communication
Publication
Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies
Volume
23
Issue
1
First Page
81
Last Page
104
ISSN
1395-4199
Identifier
10.22439/cjas.v23i1.693
Publisher
Copenhagen Business School
Citation
YAN, Jin; PANG, Augustine; and CAMERON, Glen T..
Strategic communication in crisis governance: Singapore’s management of the SARS crisis. (2006). Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies. 23, (1), 81-104.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6035
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://rauli.cbs.dk/index.php/cjas/article/view/693
Included in
Asian Studies Commons, Business and Corporate Communications Commons, Social Influence and Political Communication Commons