Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
7-2021
Abstract
This study investigates how perceptions of corporate hypocrisy from the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities connect the public’s ethical philosophy to subsequent positive/negative opinion-sharing intention. With special attention to deontology and consequentialism in normative ethics of philosophy, the current study empirically tests a theoretical model of perceived corporate hypocrisy with two causal antecedents (i.e., individual moral philosophy of deontology and consequentialism), and the mediating role of corporate hypocrisy between such antecedents and the publics’ subsequent communication intention (i.e., positive and negative opinion-sharing intentions) toward a firm. Results indicate significant mediation effects of corporate hypocrisy between personal ethical orientations and the public’s communication intention based on ethical attribution of crisis-related CSR activities.
Keywords
corporate hypocrisy, corporate social responsibility, deontological ethical frame, ethical orientation, teleological ethical frame
Discipline
Business and Corporate Communications | Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Research Areas
Corporate Communication
Publication
International Journal of Business Communication
Volume
58
Issue
3
First Page
386
Last Page
409
ISSN
2329-4892
Identifier
10.1177/2329488417747597
Publisher
SAGE
Citation
SHIM, KyuJin and KIM, Jeong-nam.
The impacts of ethical philosophy on the corporate hypocrisy perception and communication intentions toward CSR. (2021). International Journal of Business Communication. 58, (3), 386-409.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5905
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417747597
Included in
Business and Corporate Communications Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons