Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

submittedVersion

Publication Date

12-2018

Abstract

Despite many convergence products rapidly approaching market saturation, academic research yet lags behind with the focus still on the primary demand in the introduction stage. The authors close this gap by focusing on how the labeling of convergence products may impact on value perception and upgrade intentions for these products. Convergence products, which combine multiple categories of products into a single device, create a unique naming dilemma for manufacturers and retailers: Whether to opt for (a) a subordinate label—a lower‐level descriptor or name that embodies its subcategory elements (e.g., smartphone or Apple’s iPhone) or (b) a superordinate label—a higher‐level descriptor or name which transcends its subcategories (e.g., multifunctional device or Samsung’s Galaxy). The authors investigate the effects of labeling choices (i.e., subordinate vs. superordinate) on consumer value perception and upgrade intention. Results of four studies demonstrate that the labeling options exert differential effects on perceived value and upgrade intention, while the use of subordinate (vs. superordinate) label lowers the present perceived value, it raises consumer’s intention to upgrade to a newer‐generation product.

Keywords

convergence product, intrinsic motivation, product replacement, subordinate label, superordinate label, willingness-to-pay, willingness-to-upgrade

Discipline

Marketing | Sales and Merchandising

Research Areas

Marketing

Publication

Psychology and Marketing

Volume

35

Issue

12

First Page

913

Last Page

922

ISSN

0742-6046

Identifier

10.1002/mar.21144

Publisher

Wiley: 24 months

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21144

Share

COinS