Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
submittedVersion
Publication Date
9-2013
Abstract
In the context of the diversity-validity dilemma in personnel selection, the present field study compared ethnic subgroup differences on an innovative constructed response multimedia test to other commonly used selection instruments. Applicants (N=245, 27% ethnic minorities) for entry-level police jobs completed a constructed response multimedia test, cognitive ability test, language proficiency test, personality inventory, structured interview, and role play. Results demonstrated minor ethnic subgroup differences on constructed response multimedia test scores as compared to other instruments. Constructed response multimedia test scores were related to the selection decision, and no evidence for predictive bias was found. Subgroup differences were also examined on the dimensional level, with cognitively loaded dimension scores displaying larger differences.
Keywords
Diversity-validity dilemma, Employee selection, Ethnic differences, Ability testing
Discipline
Human Resources Management | Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume
21
Issue
3
First Page
239
Last Page
250
ISSN
0965-075X
Identifier
10.1111/ijsa.12034
Publisher
Wiley: 24 months
Citation
DE SOETE, Britt; LIEVENS, Filip; OOSTROM, Janneke; and WESTERVELD, Lena.
Alternative predictors for dealing with the diversity-validity dilemma in personnel selection: The constructed response multimedia test. (2013). International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 21, (3), 239-250.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5720
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12034
Included in
Human Resources Management Commons, Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons