Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
9-2008
Abstract
In our rejoinder to the comments of Kehoe (this issue) and Potosky, Bobko and Roth (this issue) we emphasize that our proposal on Pareto-optimal predictor composite formation is a complementary and not a competitive alternative for reducing the tension between selection quality and adverse impact. Our work addresses the decisions to be made once one has decided to use a predictor composite. We also further clarify the basic features of Pareto-optimal tradeoffs and Pareto-optimal composites within the context of personnel selection. In particular, we indicate that Pareto-optimal tradeoffs between validity and adverse impact emerge because these goals are different and not because of any dualism between them.
Discipline
Human Resources Management | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume
16
Issue
3
First Page
206
Last Page
209
ISSN
0965-075X
Identifier
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00426.x
Publisher
Wiley: 24 months
Citation
SACKETT, Paul R.; DE CORTE, Wilfried; and LIEVENS, Filip.
Pareto-optimal predictor composite formation: A complementary approach to alleviating the selection quality/adverse impact dilemma. (2008). International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 16, (3), 206-209.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5647
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00426.x