Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
submittedVersion
Publication Date
12-2007
Abstract
Research on constructing alternate forms of assessment center exercises is very scarce. This study examines the effectiveness of a cloning procedure (incident isomorphic approach) for developing alternate forms of a computerized in-basket. In this approach, original and alternate items are essentially similar (they are based on the same critical incident), while being superficially different (they are situated in a different context). Results showed there was no significant difference between the overall in-basket score across the alternate forms. In addition, these overall scores correlated .66, with projected estimates for the full in-basket approaching .80. Implications and limitations of the use of cloning in designing alternate assessment center exercises are discussed.
Discipline
Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume
15
Issue
4
First Page
428
Last Page
433
ISSN
0965-075X
Identifier
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00401.x
Publisher
Wiley: 24 months
Citation
LIEVENS, Filip and ANSEEL, Frederik.
Creating alternate in-basket forms through cloning: Some preliminary results. (2007). International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 15, (4), 428-433.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5624
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00401.x
Included in
Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons