Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
submittedVersion
Publication Date
6-2012
Abstract
We believe that Scherbaum, Goldstein, Yusko, Ryan, and Hanges (2012) come up short in (a) their portrayal of the current understanding of the nature of intelligence as it exists in the science of mental abilities and (b) their treatment of the measurement of intelligence constructs. We argue that their view on the nature of intelligence is outdated and that measuring constructs within the domain of intelligence should not be equated only with the use of traditional cognitive ability tests as alternative workbased measures of intelligence constructs have emerged and are in dire need of empirical scrutiny.
Discipline
Human Resources Management | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Volume
5
Issue
2
First Page
153
Last Page
158
ISSN
1754-9426
Identifier
10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01421.x
Publisher
Wiley: 12 months / Cambridge University Press (CUP): HSS Journals
Citation
LIEVENS, Filip and REEVE, Charlie L..
Where I-O psychology should really (re)start its investigation of intelligence constructs and their measurement. (2012). Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 5, (2), 153-158.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5615
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01421.x
