Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

submittedVersion

Publication Date

6-2012

Abstract

We believe that Scherbaum, Goldstein, Yusko, Ryan, and Hanges (2012) come up short in (a) their portrayal of the current understanding of the nature of intelligence as it exists in the science of mental abilities and (b) their treatment of the measurement of intelligence constructs. We argue that their view on the nature of intelligence is outdated and that measuring constructs within the domain of intelligence should not be equated only with the use of traditional cognitive ability tests as alternative workbased measures of intelligence constructs have emerged and are in dire need of empirical scrutiny.

Discipline

Human Resources Management | Organizational Behavior and Theory

Research Areas

Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources

Publication

Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Volume

5

Issue

2

First Page

153

Last Page

158

ISSN

1754-9426

Identifier

10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01421.x

Publisher

Wiley: 12 months / Cambridge University Press (CUP): HSS Journals

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01421.x

Share

COinS